Our Blog.

Here is a pattern we watch play out constantly. A founder invests real money and real attention in a launch film, gets something they are proud of, posts it once on launch day, and waits. A few hundred views trickle in from people who already follow the company. The film was good. The launch was quiet. And the conclusion the founder draws, wrongly, is that video did not work. The film was never the problem. The distribution was. A launch film is not a deliverable you publish, it is source material you deploy, and the founders who understand that difference get an order of magnitude more out of the same asset.

Polaris is a creative companion for people who build imaginary worlds. Novelists, screenwriters, songwriters, concept artists, indie game developers. You talk to it like a collaborator at 2am, and it listens, asks the questions you missed, and remembers your characters, your lore, your voice. Whatever you make stays yours, end-to-end encrypted, never sold, never used to train AI. When the team came to us for a launch film, we hit the problem that defines most software launches. Almost none of that is filmable. There is no interface worth shooting, no feature that photographs, no moment where the product does something a camera can capture. The thing Polaris actually sells is a feeling: privacy, and the trust that comes with it. Our job was to make that feeling legible, and to make it for an audience of working creatives who can spot a generic SaaS ad from across the room. Here is how we did it, and why the approach matters for any founder thinking about how to launch.

Almost every founder we film is compelling in a meeting and stiff in the first take. The same person who can hold a room for an hour, unscripted, goes rigid the moment a lens is pointed at them. Their vocabulary changes. They start using words they would never say out loud to another human being. Somewhere around take four, they relax, and the good material finally arrives. This is so common that it is basically the default. It is also worth understanding, because the cause is not nerves and the fix is not confidence.

The most powerful video a startup can make in 2026 is also one of the simplest. It is the founder, on camera, telling the truth about why the company exists. In a year when nearly everything else about video has gotten more automated, more abundant, and more synthetic, that one thing has quietly become the hardest to fake and the most valuable to own. The market is making this obvious. Look at what is actually working right now and a clear pattern emerges. Audiences have stopped rewarding polish for its own sake and started rewarding real people with something real at stake. The trend reports coming out this month keep landing on the same blunt advice for founders: put an actual person, with actual conviction, on camera. As feeds fill with generated content and buyers increasingly form opinions inside AI answers before they ever reach your site, human authorship has turned into a competitive signal. Trust has become a distribution factor. People share, cite, and buy from companies they believe, and belief is far easier to build from a face than from a logo.

Meta has rolled out expanded disclosure labels for advertising on Facebook and Instagram, and while the change looks small on the surface, the direction it points is worth every founder's attention. Here is what actually happened. Ads created or significantly edited with generative AI now carry a disclosure inside the "About this ad" panel, the menu users reach by tapping the three dots on a promoted post. Meta applies the label automatically when advertisers use its own AI features, like background generation, image generation, and animation, and it detects third-party tools such as Photoshop and DALL-E through the C2PA metadata standard. It extends the AI labeling Meta already uses on organic posts into paid advertising, and it comes with a disclosure control in Ads Manager that advertisers are expected to use when their creative contains AI-generated or AI-altered content. Taken alone, a note buried in an info panel is not dramatic. Taken as a signal of where the whole system is heading, it is.

There is more venture money in the market than almost any point in history, and for most founders it has never felt harder to reach. Both things are true at once, and understanding why is the difference between a raise that closes and one that stalls. The headlines make the abundance obvious. This month alone, the video-AI company Twelve Labs raised $100 million with Amazon and Nvidia behind it, and that barely registered against the mega-rounds now setting the tone: OpenAI reportedly closing a raise near $110 billion, xAI pulling in $20 billion, Baseten taking $1.5 billion in its fourth round in 18 months. The money is real. The problem is where it goes. By recent Crunchbase figures, close to 88 percent of AI startup funding in 2026 went to US-based companies, and an outsized share of that flowed to a small circle of giant names. If you are not one of them, you are not raising in that market. You are raising in a much more selective one, and it runs on different rules.

The 2026 marketing playbook is easy to summarize. Use AI to make ten times the video at a tenth of the cost, post daily, test everything, and let volume win. The tools are real, the savings are real, and the pressure to do this is real. It is also, for a growing number of brands, starting to backfire. The interesting thing is that the entertainment industry, which has every incentive to chase the technology, is quietly arriving at a more nuanced answer. This year's major trend reports have converged on a single theme. Dentsu titled its 2026 media outlook "Human Truths in the Algorithmic Era." EY's framing centers on authenticity and experience. One widely cited report called 2026 the year the industry stopped chasing technology and started redefining meaning. None of these are anti-AI. The same studios and agencies writing them are signing AI deals as fast as they can. A major Hollywood agency just partnered with an AI firm to help its clients tell new stories, and even Getty, which once sued over AI, is now licensing hundreds of millions of assets to OpenAI. The message is not reject the tools. It is stop letting the tools set the strategy. For a founder deciding how to use AI video, that distinction is the whole game.

Two stories landed within days of each other this past week, and read together they map the fork the entire video industry is now standing at. In one, Google's DeepMind invested about $75 million in A24, the independent studio behind Moonlight, Everything Everywhere All at Once, and the recent hit Backrooms. In the other, ByteDance unveiled Seedance 2.5, a model that generates a 30-second commercial in native 4K for nearly nothing. One company paid a fortune for access to how great films get made. The other made the making of them look almost free. The distance between those two bets is the most useful thing a founder can think about right now when deciding how to make their own video.

This week the advertising industry gathered on the French Riviera for Cannes Lions, the festival that has always worked as an early read on where the business is heading. For two years running, the conversation there was dominated by what AI could do. This year the mood shifted, and the shift is worth paying attention to if you are a company deciding how to make your next video. The headline from Cannes 2026 is not that AI has taken over creative work. It is that the industry has decided where AI belongs, and where it does not. As generative tools make video faster, cheaper, and more abundant than ever, the thing that has become scarce, and therefore valuable, is the human judgment and authenticity that no model can produce. The festival gave that idea a name it did not have before. Call it the authenticity premium.

Startups spend months, sometimes years, building a product. Founders refine the features, teams polish the website, investors pore over the deck. Then, a few days out from launch, someone in a meeting asks the question nobody planned for: do we have a launch video? What follows is a scramble. One of the most important assets the company will ever publish gets built in a week, under deadline pressure, with no time to think. We see it constantly. The video usually gets finished and the date usually gets hit. What suffers is everything that actually makes a launch video work.

The AI video space moves fast enough that a ranking written in March is usually wrong by June. Models leapfrog each other monthly, pricing shifts, and the leaderboards that crown a winner one week reshuffle the next. So treat this as a snapshot, accurate as of mid-June 2026, of where the major tools stand and how the market is reacting to the newest arrival. That arrival is Google's Gemini Omni, which reset the conversation when it rolled out more broadly this month. It is worth understanding what it actually does, why the reaction has been so loud, and how it stacks up against the established players: Runway, Kling, Higgsfield, Veo, and Sora.

Y Combinator's Spring 2026 Demo Day is June 16. The P26 batch will present to one of the densest concentrations of serious capital that ever assembles in one place. By Y Combinator's own description, there is hardly another moment when so large a share of the top startup investors has its attention pointed at the same thing. Each founder gets about a minute. That is the part everyone fixates on. It is also the part that matters least, because the companies that win Demo Day have usually won it before they walk on stage. The pitch is the visible tip of a much longer effort, and the founders who break out are the ones who arrived already carrying momentum into the room.

Every year thousands of startups launch with real technology, real problems to solve, and credible founders behind them. Plenty of them still fail. The reason is often not the product. It is that the people who might have bought it never trusted the company enough to try. This is the quiet disadvantage every new company starts with. An established brand carries years of accumulated trust into every sale. A startup that launched six months ago carries none. When a customer weighs two companies offering the same thing, the familiar one feels safer almost by default, and "safer" wins more often than founders like to admit. Closing that gap quickly is one of the hardest and most important things an early-stage company has to do, and video has become one of the most effective ways to do it.

Startups are investing up to $140,000 in a single launch video. Here's what really drives the return, with real examples from Cluely, Dollar Shave Club, and Dropbox.

The research is clear: video builds trust, and trust is what turns startup attention into customers. Here's how to use it.

The best fundraising tool is not your deck. It is a sixty-second film that keeps pitching for you in every room you cannot walk into. That is how single demo day appearances turn into multi-million dollar rounds.

Video drives action: 65% of execs visited a vendor site after watching a work video. Investors skim decks: ~2:42 average time per deck (DocSend). Kickstarter: 50% success w/ video vs 30% without. Kickstarter: 75% of successful campaigns include video. Pitch video research: +3pp funding probability per 1 SD increase in pitch positivity.

Use AI to multiply your creative options. Use humans to choose what’s true, what’s bold, and what will actually move people.

The soul never thinks without an image. Investors spend minutes, not hours, evaluating you, story isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s the thing that gives your company a fighting chance to be understood quickly.